INSIDE THE INDEX
Framework and Theory
The Index ranks the world's countries by Elite Quality. Elite Power, the ability of elites to set up extractive business models in the future, as well as actual Value Creation vs Extraction in the Economic and Political dimensions, are measured on the basis of dozens of Indicators.
The Elite Theory of Economic Development (ETED) posits that a nation's long-term economic and human development is fundamentally determined by the quality of its elite system. Rather than focusing strictly on ideology or formal structures, the ETED parsimoniously measures the proportion of productive value creation and risk origination relative to extractive value transfers and rent-seeking driven by dominant elite business models. Ultimately, sustainable development is achieved through transformational leadership and robust intra-elite competition, which systematically incentivize elite coalitions to grow the overall economic pie for all stakeholders instead of leveraging their power to merely capture a larger slice of it. To further familiarize you with the theory, the publisher De Gruyter offers the 900-page ETED treatise as a free downloadable open-access PDF and EPUB here.
EQx Architecture
The Index is based on a 4-level architecture allowing for both an overall quantification of a country's EQx, as well as an in-depth analysis of specific political economy dimensions.
The EQx Architecture Flat View
The EQx Architecture Layered View
One composite EQx score summarises how a country's elites create or extract value.
Four index areas split Power and Value across political and economic dimensions.
Twelve pillars group the core mechanisms behind elite power and value creation.
148 indicators provide the datasets that feed the pillars and final EQx score.
Level 1: EQx Index
What is the concept behind our Index?
The EQx is an internationally comparative measurement of elite quality. Built on a structured, multi-level framework that captures how power is exercised—toward value creation or extractive rent-seeking. The EQx aggregates evidence of first-order value creation and second-order value transfers, collected at the indicator level, into a coherent characterization of a country’s political economy relative to the world.
Level 2: EQx Index Areas (x4)
The Index can be divided in 2 Sub-Indices: Power and Value. Power is seen as a necessary condition for Value Extraction and rent seeking since Value Extraction business models require Power to operate effectively.
Both Sub-Indices in turn include a Political and an Economic Dimension. This yields 4 Index Areas: on the Power Sub-Index, Political Power (i) and Economic Power (ii); on the Value Sub-Index, Political Value (iii) and Economic Value (iv).
Level 3: EQx Pillars (x12)
The 12 EQx Pillars are distributed three to each Index Area, where they serve as the conceptual home for a family of related Indicators. Each refers to a distinct way power is exercised or value created in a country's political economy, and yields specific insight into an aspect of a nation's elite system.
Political Power (i)
- State Capture (i.1)
- Regulatory Capture (i.2)
- Human Capture (i.3)
Economic Power (ii)
- Coalition Dominance (ii.4)
- Firm Dominance (ii.5)
- Creative Destruction (ii.6)
Political Value (iii)
- Giving Income (iii.7)
- Taking Income (iii.8)
- Unearned Income (iii.9)
Economic Value (iv)
- Producer Value (iv.10)
- Capital Value (iv.11)
- Labor Value (iv.12)
Level 4: EQx Indicators (x148)
Indicators are the underlying datasets from which the Index is constructed. The datasets are collected, conceptually validated and collated. They mainly come from renowned international organisations such as the World Bank, IMF, OECD, as well as other leading indices.
The EQx2026 is based on 148 Indicators. The new incorporation, adjustment and update of Indicators, as well as the elimination of unsatisfactory datasets, is a fundamental part of the ongoing EQx research project.
| Why we measure | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR | Political corruption | The chosen Indicator dataset "includes measures of six distinct types of corruption that cover both different areas and levels of the polity realm, distinguishing between executive, legislative and judicial corruption. (…) The measures thus tap into several distinguished types of corruption: both 'petty' and 'grand'; both bribery and theft; both corruption aimed at influencing law making and that affecting implementation" (V-DEM, website). | Political corruption is a direct measure of Value Extraction facilitated by State Capture, which is anchored in Political Power. It is one of the most blatant and direct forms of rent seeking, as corruption is a form of theft and plunder. Political corruption also erects barriers to the emergence of Value Creation business models, thus distorting the market. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Extraction |
| COC | Control of corruption | The Control of corruption Indicator is derived from the World Bank's Worldwide Governance indicators (WGI) project that: "captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including both petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as 'capture' of the state by elites and private interests" (World Bank, website). | Control of corruption analyzes the effects of corruption on the public and complements the Political corruption Indicator (COR). Perceptions of the existence of corruption are critical because they influence the level of trust in the political system, with two implications for Value Creation. First, corrupt elites have engaged in successful State Capture through extractive business models at the cost of non-elites. Second, non-elites face barriers, distractions and costs if they wish to invest and engage in Value Creation models that would benefit society at large. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation |
| OPG | Open government | Open government, a factor in the World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index, measures "the openness of government defined by the extent to which a government shares information, empowers people with tools to hold the government accountable, and fosters citizen participation in public policy deliberations. This factor measures whether basic laws and information on legal rights are publicized and evaluates the quality of information published by the government" (World Justice Project, n.d). | Open government is associated with transparency, accessibility, and citizen participation, enabling a more equitable distribution of power amongst a country's population. Thus, non-elites are empowered to challenge and check elite power, reducing the permissibility of value extracting business models such as rent seeking. Moreover, transparency and accessibility also enable and boost the participation of non-elites in decision-making and increase trust in institutions, thereby fostering a culture of innovation and enhancing the willingness to invest. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation |
| RTC | Government's responsiveness to change | Government's responsiveness to change is measured through an indicator included in the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Index, which is based on the survey question: "In your country, to what extent does the government respond effectively to change (e.g. technological changes, societal and demographic trends, security and economic challenges)?" (WEF, website). The WEF Executive Opinion Survey captures the views of more than 16,000 business executives in 140 countries. | Government's responsiveness to change is a determining factor in incentivizing Value Creation business models. A state free from change-resistant vested interests is open to new possibilities, business models, and emerging interest groups inspired and enabled by technological, economic, geopolitical, etc., trends and disruptions. Value Creation opportunities are recognized and enabled from a regulatory perspective in such an environment. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation |
| EPR | E-Participation Index | The E-Participation Index aims to measure the possibilities offered by governments to its to citizens to participate online; ranging from simply accessing information to engaging with and co-designing policies (UN, website) | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation | |
| PFD | Press freedom | Press freedom is measured by referencing the World Press Freedom Index and reflects the degree of freedom afforded to journalists in 180 countries. It is determined by pooling the responses of experts to a questionnaire devised by Reporters Without Borders (RSF). The questionnaire covers "pluralism, media independence, media environment and self-censorship, legislative framework, transparency, and the quality of the infrastructure that supports the production of news and information" (RSF, website). | The greater the degree of Press freedom within a country, the greater the Value Creation in its political economy. It contributes to the creation of a vibrant market for ideas and enhances competition in the political and economic arenas. The provision of authentic information is critical. A high level of Press freedom puts pressure on rentier elites and shines a light on Value Extraction and rent-seeking activities that disadvantage society. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation |
| NJK | Nr. of journalists killed per 1 million people (2yrs avg.) | NJK uses data from the Committee to Protect Journalists. It measures the number of a country's journalists killed, adjusted per million inhabitants. This Indicator includes all instances where journalists lose their lives, whether the death is connected to their professional life or not. This Indicator uses a two-year average. | Journalists are a knowledge elite that provide checks and balances on political and business elites. When political elites kill journalists, either directly, through surrogates, or by failing to protect them against business elites, this reflects capture of the state apparatus by elites prepared to use the most horrifying of methods to suppress a narrative or information that challenges Value Extraction elite business models. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Extraction |
| PDE | Political decentralization | Political decentralization examines the self-governance powers afforded to local governments and assesses the degree of decentralization at the legislative and executive levels, as well as the provisions for direct democracy (Ivanyna & Shah, 2014). | Political decentralization spreads Political Power by providing higher levels of autonomy for subnational governments. Local government is likely to be "more accountable to local citizens and more appropriate to local needs and preferences" (Johnson, 2003, p. vi) than a distant, centralized government. A direct local voice in executive and legislative institutions better supports local Value Creation models. On the other hand, Value Extraction is more likely if centralized legislative executive functions control relatively large budgets. As a counter argument, high levels of Political decentralization can be inefficient, eroding state capacity to provide public goods and leading to redundancy. *An optimal level for this Indicator might be established in the future. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Extraction |
| ADE | Administrative decentralization | Administrative decentralization measures "the ability of local governments to hire and fire and set terms of employment of local employees as well as having regulatory control over own functions" (Ivanyna & Shah, 2014, p.17) | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation | |
| PGL | Political globalization | Political globalization is measured by using the political dimension of the KOF Globalization Index. It encompasses factors such as the number of embassies and international NGOs located in a particular country, as well as participation in UN peacekeeping missions. Moreover, it is comprised of variables relating to the membership of international/ multilateral organizations and international/multilateral treaties. | The higher the level of Political globalization, the more constrained the Political Power of national elites becomes in the context of the sovereign state. International norms and accountability to supranational institutions such as the WTO limit elite power. International institutions are assumed to be inclusive. | Political Power (i) | State Capture (i.1) | Value Creation |
EQx Methodology
EQx Ongoing Research Project
Concept Phase
EQx constructs, architecture and theoretical aspects are developed in the initial 'Concept' phase (2 steps).
Input Phase
The 'Input' phase (4 steps) starts with the collection of the datasets underlying individual EQx Indicators. These are selected on the basis of a theoretical fit and culled from diverse sources.
Output Phase
The 'Output' phase (3 steps) sees the determination of the EQx Country Scores and Global Rank. The final phase includes statistical testing and validation, followed by the publication of results.
Annual reports and rank shifts over time
Historical EQx releases show how country positions move as the index expands its coverage, indicators and analytical depth. This view highlights selected rank changes between EQx2021 and EQx2026.
The full view uses the Excel rankings, keeping the original left-to-right history structure without collapsing every outside-top-20 movement into the same point.





